Gabriela Muñoz
← Back to projects

Terapify · Case study

Video calls for therapy sessions

How we went from psychologists and patients preferring Zoom to 85% of sessions happening inside Terapify.

Role
End-to-end Product Designer
Team
CTO, Head of Operations, and development
Platform
Web and mobile
Methods
Survey of 125 users, interviews, pattern analysis
Terapify video call on desktop with audio, video, screen sharing, and chat controls

10% → 85%

of sessions inside Terapify's video call

61%

of psychologists had problems in every session

125

users surveyed to understand the problem

Terapify video conferencing

Terapify's video conferencing allows patients and psychologists to have therapy sessions without using another platform. In October 2020 we started working on the design with the development team.

Problem Statement

In October 2020 we launched the first video calls version for psychologists and patients. At this moment, the design was basic. The users could only join a therapy session and send messages. They couldn’t share screens, or control their microphone and camera. This caused users to not want to use it and prefer using another video calling platform like Zoom, Google meet, or WhatsApp.

After that, we received a lot of complaints about video calls.

First, we needed to know what browser and device psychologists used, because Terapify video conferencing works in the browser.

First version of the video call: pre-appointment screen with the Start appointment button and an empty side chat

Research

In this research we focused on psychologists, since they are the face of Terapify in front of patients, and are the user who has presented the most complaints.

Online survey

We decided to use surveys because it was the data we needed were quantitative and the questions with choices.

We included the following questions:

  • What browser do they use to give therapy
  • Which other platform/s do they, use?
  • How often do they have problems using the Terapify platform?
  • What video call application do you use for therapy?
  • Why do you use another video call application?

Interviews

To identify the errors or problems that happen when giving therapy are.

Interviews were conducted with psychologists who frequently have problems in their sessions.

Opportunities

Evaluation of existing applications

The patterns used in the interface respond to the standard of the video call platforms.

For example, we find that in Zoom and Google the controls are kept at the bottom, and at the same time the first actions placed are microphone, camera, screen sharing and hang up.

The chat pattern using a sidebar allows the user to have the possibility to open and close the chat whenever they want.

The layouts were evaluated when more people join the video call.

Incorporation of help messages to inform the user about the status of their connection.

Incorporation of choosing which window to share.

Comparison of a group video call on an existing platform with the first version of Terapify's video call

Key features

  • Secure meeting rooms
  • Video call design patterns
  • Screen sharing
  • Internal chat
  • Wi-Fi network alerts.
  • Test their Wi-Fi network
  • Select the camera and microphone to use in the session
  • Allow the user to share their screen
  • Layouts in couple sessions and individual sessions
  • Mobile version

Desktop version

Desktop video call: main video, self-view thumbnail, secure room and Wi-Fi indicators, and bottom controlsDesktop video call: one participant with video and the other with camera off and microphone muted, showing the Terapify logoDesktop video call with two participants side by sideUnstable connection notice over the video, with the Wi-Fi indicator in yellow

Mobile version

Mobile video call with full-screen video and bottom controlsMobile video call with the self-view thumbnail over the main videoMobile video call with the notice “Unstable connection, we recommend turning off your camera”Mobile video call with the notice “Unstable connection, check your internet connection” and camera and microphone offMobile Session ended screen with a five-star rating and the question of whether to book the next appointmentMobile rating screen with three stars, the question about the reason, and a comment field

Conclusions

In general, failures and complaints about audio and image are the most constant complaint from users, both psychologists, and patients.

The lack of use in the background from mobile devices, and not being able to share screens from these devices, is something that makes it difficult for them to take the sessions smoothly.

Not being able to take the session from any browser is also something that should be considered important, since users open the platform from the email on their cell phone, and it sends them to the native browser of the device.